<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Incoming Links From Pages In The Supplemental Index</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/link-building/incoming-links-supplemental-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/link-building/incoming-links-supplemental-index/</link>
	<description>Website &#38; Internet Marketing Advice by Duncan Carver</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:49:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grow mushrooms</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/link-building/incoming-links-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>grow mushrooms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 08:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/?p=219#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post Duncan. Now I have validated the notion of &quot;every link counts&quot;, high PR or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post Duncan. Now I have validated the notion of &#8220;every link counts&#8221;, high PR or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/link-building/incoming-links-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/?p=219#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the detailed response Duncan. I do something similar to your colleagues (using  a blog network to create links) and it has been effective up to now. Mostly duplicate content as you say.

What does concern me slightly though is the lack of pagerank assigned to any of these blogs. In 80% of the cases, a gray pagerank bar - even though the blogs have pages indexed, and are returned in search results for certain keywords.

I&#039;m sure they&#039;re not banned, but in some cases the blogs are almost 2 years old, and still gray pagerank. I&#039;m wondering if the fact that they are blogs is significant here. Most blogs would be a sub domain name of the &#039;host&#039; site (yourblog.wordpress.com), and perhaps any pagerank is improving the main site??

Pagerank is something I continually tell myself not to be concerned with, but the gray bars do worry me sometimes. The blogs are obviously indexed and should be all white pagerank at the very least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the detailed response Duncan. I do something similar to your colleagues (using  a blog network to create links) and it has been effective up to now. Mostly duplicate content as you say.</p>
<p>What does concern me slightly though is the lack of pagerank assigned to any of these blogs. In 80% of the cases, a gray pagerank bar &#8211; even though the blogs have pages indexed, and are returned in search results for certain keywords.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re not banned, but in some cases the blogs are almost 2 years old, and still gray pagerank. I&#8217;m wondering if the fact that they are blogs is significant here. Most blogs would be a sub domain name of the &#8216;host&#8217; site (yourblog.wordpress.com), and perhaps any pagerank is improving the main site??</p>
<p>Pagerank is something I continually tell myself not to be concerned with, but the gray bars do worry me sometimes. The blogs are obviously indexed and should be all white pagerank at the very least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/link-building/incoming-links-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/?p=219#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Here you go...

&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/images/google-supplemental-result-example.png&quot; alt=&quot;Google Supplemental Results Example&quot; /&gt;

Notice it&#039;s actually marked as a Supplemental Result. They are not that common to see when searching every day and generally only appear when searching on very specific and unsual keyword terms / combinations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here you go&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/images/google-supplemental-result-example.png" alt="Google Supplemental Results Example" /></p>
<p>Notice it&#8217;s actually marked as a Supplemental Result. They are not that common to see when searching every day and generally only appear when searching on very specific and unsual keyword terms / combinations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon b.</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/link-building/incoming-links-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>jon b.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/?p=219#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Can you give me an example of a page in the supplemental index?  I have never seen something labeled as supplemental.  Or maybe wasn&#039;t looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you give me an example of a page in the supplemental index?  I have never seen something labeled as supplemental.  Or maybe wasn&#8217;t looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/link-building/incoming-links-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/?p=219#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon, it depends on what you mean by the supplemental index.

The supplemental index &lt;strong&gt;IS NOT&lt;/strong&gt; the additional results you see after you click on the following link in Google...

&lt;em&gt;&quot;In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 43 already displayed. If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

...these are just &quot;Additional Similar Results&quot;.

Supplemental indexed pages are marked as being &quot;supplemental&quot; in the actual search results next to the specific listing. If they are in the supplemental index then that&#039;s where they remain (unless heavily modified). 

And more often than not, given that they are in the supplemental index for a reason, they&#039;re going to show up as supplemental for pretty much all keyword terms a user could search on to find them anyway (i.e. they&#039;re suffering from duplicate content issues which means someone else with the same content IS showing in the primary index and beating them for the same search terms and traffic).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon, it depends on what you mean by the supplemental index.</p>
<p>The supplemental index <strong>IS NOT</strong> the additional results you see after you click on the following link in Google&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 43 already displayed. If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>&#8230;these are just &#8220;Additional Similar Results&#8221;.</p>
<p>Supplemental indexed pages are marked as being &#8220;supplemental&#8221; in the actual search results next to the specific listing. If they are in the supplemental index then that&#8217;s where they remain (unless heavily modified). </p>
<p>And more often than not, given that they are in the supplemental index for a reason, they&#8217;re going to show up as supplemental for pretty much all keyword terms a user could search on to find them anyway (i.e. they&#8217;re suffering from duplicate content issues which means someone else with the same content IS showing in the primary index and beating them for the same search terms and traffic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon b.</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/link-building/incoming-links-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>jon b.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingtoday.com/?p=219#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Hi Duncan,

Correct me if my theory is wrong but aren&#039;t sites that are in the supplemental index in that supplemental index for whatever specific term you typed in?  In other words, for another search query they may not be in the supplemental index.  So in reality your link would be counted the same as any similar type of link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Duncan,</p>
<p>Correct me if my theory is wrong but aren&#8217;t sites that are in the supplemental index in that supplemental index for whatever specific term you typed in?  In other words, for another search query they may not be in the supplemental index.  So in reality your link would be counted the same as any similar type of link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

